
Lawlor Winston's Notable Verdicts & Settlements
South Florida Trial Lawyers Serving all of Florida
In personal injury law, the verdicts and settlements can certainly measure that of a firm’s success; however, the extent of injuries both mental and physical can cause such distress that the settlements may not necessarily reflect the victim’s true pain. We understand that and are sensitive to our clients' needs. We want to gain results commensurate with the pain, suffering and unjust that might have happened during this difficult time. While nothing can replace the loss of a loved one or hurt of a family member, friend or even yourself, we want you to have confidence that we will do our best to fight to undo the wrong done to you. We know that no experience is alike, and no client has the exact same needs. At Lawlor Winston, we don’t believe in “cookie-cutter” cases, but building a customized approach around you.Auto Accidents
Insurance Bad Faith
RSD/CRPS
Premises Liability/Slip & Fall Injuries
Medical Malpractice
Legal Malpractice
Maritime/Admiralty/Cruise Injuries
Other Personal Injury
Civil Litigation
Appeals
Auto Accidents

George and Jennie T. were rear-ended in their Nissan Sentra by a private school bus operated by an elderly driver with terminal cancer. Mr. and Mrs. T.’s injuries were catastrophic, but both have made excellent recoveries after lengthy hospital stays and surgeries. The defendant bus company destroyed evidence in violation of a Court Order, and this was a factor in obtaining the ultimate result.
Kimberly H. v. Trugreen Limited Partnership & Benjamin McCallum: $890,350 Settlement
Kim was 25-years old when the defendant driver, while in the course and scope of his employment with Trugreen, ran a red light as she was making a left turn. Ms. H.‘s injuries resulted in torn labra in both shoulders, and four unsuccessful surgeries attempting to repair same.
Rafael P. suffered multiple fractured bones and lacerations when he rear-ended a Lyon’s tow truck which pulled out in front of him and stopped during rush hour on I-95 in Palm Beach County. Pre-trial, Plaintiff offered to accept $150,000 as full and final settlement. Defendant’s highest offer was $17,000. The jury returned a verdict in Plaintiff’s favor of $250,000 (which was reduced by 20% for Plaintiff’s comparative fault), and the Court entered an Order awarding Lawlor Winston $200,000 for attorney fees and costs due to the Defendant’s unreasonable rejection of Plaintiff’s pre-trial offer.
Luis M. v. Christopher Page, et. al.: $345,000 Recovery on $110,000 in Coverage
Luis M. was a passenger in his employer's truck being driven by a co-worker when it was struck by Christopher Page, who was driving his parents’ Corvette. As a result, Luis suffered multiple injuries requiring surgery. The Defendants held a Bodily Injury policy of $100,000, and Luis held an Uninsured Motorist policy of $10,000. Rather than simply accept those policies, Lawlor Winston worked to find additional coverage. As a result, an additional $100,000 was obtained from Luis’ employer's carrier for failing to obtain a valid UM rejection. Christopher Page’s parents were divorced and the firm successfully argued the single $100,000 policy limit should be doubled, ultimately recovering $100,000 on behalf of each parent. Before accepting the $200,000 from the parents' insurance company, the firm required financial affidavits from each Defendant, which revealed the father was a high wage earner. Thereafter, he personally contributed an additional $35,000 to the settlement.
Patel v. Noblitt and Purple Pizza Eaters, Inc. : $1,775,000 pre-trial settlement for injuries sustained in motor vehicle rollover.
In 2001, Plaintiff was driving his Nissan Pathfinder on Florida Avenue in Tampa, Florida when Travis Noblitt exited a parking lot and struck the side of Plaintiff’s vehicle causing it to turn on its side. Plaintiff’s left arm was resting on the window at the time of the crash and the vehicle landed on top of the arm, causing a near-amputation crush injury. Plaintiff and his wife owned a cleaning company that they were forced to sell after Plaintiff could no longer work.
Terrance H. v. Bernice Volz: $8,500,000 Judgment
Terrance H. was 12 years old when he darted out into traffic in front of Bernice Volz, who was speeding and failed to take any evasive action until after her vehicle struck and ran over Terrance, eviscerating and paralyzing him from the mid-chest down. Ms. Volz’s insurance company failed to tender payment of her $10,000 policy of insurance presuit, resulting in a bad-faith lawsuit which subsequently settled for a confidential amount.
Benedetto P. v. Sharon Turner Insurer: $900,000 Judgment
Benedetto P. suffered severe brain injuries in a terrible automobile accident. Mr. Petraoli’s right of way was violated by Sharon Turner, who was under the influence of multiple medications, including psychotropics. Ms. Turner's insurance company failed to tender payment of her $25,000 policy of insurance presuit, resulting in a bad-faith lawsuit which subsequently settled for a confidential amount.
Natacha O. v. Raymond O., et. al.: $610,000 Recovery
Natacha O. was a 14 year-old passenger in her Grandparent’s car being driven by her father when he lost control and hit a tree. As a result, Natacha was paralyzed from the mid-chest down. The Defendant’s insurance company failed to investigate the matter for nearly one year pre-suit, and failed to timely offer their $10,000 limits of bodily injury coverage. As a result, Natacha sued her father and grandparents. Under Florida law, her recovery was limited to the policy amount as to her father, and to $600,000 as to her grandparents. The insurance carrier made the business decision to pay these capped amounts rather than litigate the inevitable bad faith case.
Scott S. v. State Farm: $275,000 Recovery
Mr. S. sustained a herniated disk in his neck faith case. resulting from a rear-end automobile collision. The Tortfeasor was without insurance and, therefore, Mr. S. filed a claim against his Uninsured Motorist Carrier. This case was settled in suit, after Mr. Schachter underwent cervical spine surgery.
Greg H. v. Lipfield, et al.: $200,000 Recovery
Greg H. was rear-ended in his family van by Lisa Lipfield, who held a $25,000 policy of insurance. So great was the impact, that Mr. H. ultimately underwent cervical spinal surgery with discectomy and fusion. Ms. Lipfield’s insurer, Allstate, refused to tender the limits of insurance presuit, and ultimately paid the sum of $150,000 at mediation due to bad faith exposure. An additional $50,000 was paid by Mr. H.’s underinsured motorist carrier.
Gerald Y. v. Jurgens, et al.: $132,500 Recovery
Gerald Y. was rear-ended by Kyle Jurgens, who held a $25,000 policy of insurance. Mr. Y. ultimately underwent cervical spinal surgery with discectomy and fusion. The Jurgens' insurer, Allstate, refused to tender the limits of insurance presuit, and ultimately paid the sum of $112,500 at mediation due to bad faith exposure. An additional $20,000 was paid by Mr. Y.’s underinsured motorist carrier.
Insurance Bad Faith
Terrance H. v. Bernice Volz: $8,500,000 Judgment on $10,000 Policy Benedetto P. v. Sharon Turner Insurer: $900,000 Judgment on $25,000 Policy
Benedetto P. suffered severe brain injuries in a terrible automobile accident. Mr. Petraoli’s right of way was violated by Sharon Turner, who was under the influence of multiple medications, including psychotropics. Ms. Turner's insurance company failed to tender payment of her $25,000 policy of insurance presuit, resulting in a bad-faith lawsuit which subsequently settled for a confidential amount.
Natacha O. v. Raymond O., et. al.: $610,000 Recovery on $10,000 Policy
Natacha O. was a 14 year-old passenger in her Grandparent’s car being driven by her father when he lost control and hit a tree. As a result, Natacha was paralyzed from the mid-chest down. The Defendant’s insurance company failed to investigate the matter for nearly one year pre-suit, and failed to timely offer their $10,000 limits of bodily injury coverage. As a result, Natacha sued her father and grandparents. Under Florida law, her recovery was limited to the policy amount as to her father, and to $600,000 as to her grandparents. The insurance carrier made the business decision to pay these capped amounts rather than litigate the inevitable bad faith case.
Scott S. v. State Farm: $275,000 Recovery on $25,000 Uninsured Motorist Policy
Mr. S. sustained a herniated disk in his neck faith case. resulting from a rear-end automobile collision. The Tortfeasor was without insurance and, therefore, Mr. S. filed a claim against his Uninsured Motorist Carrier. This case was settled in suit, after Mr. Schachter underwent cervical spine surgery.
Greg H. v. Lipfield, et al.: $200,000 Recovery on $25,000 Policy
Greg H. was rear-ended in his family van by Lisa Lipfield, who held a $25,000 policy of insurance. So great was the impact, that Mr. H. ultimately underwent cervical spinal surgery with discectomy and fusion. Ms. Lipfield’s insurer, Allstate, refused to tender the limits of insurance presuit, and ultimately paid the sum of $150,000 at mediation due to bad faith exposure. An additional $50,000 was paid by Mr. H.’s underinsured motorist carrier.
Gerald Y. v. Jurgens, et al.: $132,500 Recovery on $25,000 Policy
Gerald Y. was rear-ended by Kyle Jurgens, who held a $25,000 policy of insurance. Mr. Y. ultimately underwent cervical spinal surgery with discectomy and fusion. The Jurgens' insurer, Allstate, refused to tender the limits of insurance presuit, and ultimately paid the sum of $112,500 at mediation due to bad faith exposure. An additional $20,000 was paid by Mr. Y.’s underinsured motorist carrier.
Melissa and her husband were visiting a boat showroom owned by MarineMax when she fell from an elevated platform erected without building permits or inspection. The platform did not have hand-rails and otherwise violated applicable building and safety codes. Melissa’s original shoulder injury required corrective surgery, after which she developed Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), also known as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
Premises Liability/Slip & Fall Injuries
Sandra M. v. Ristorante Bova: $3,000,000 Recovery Sandra was an opera singer on break while performing at the Defendant’s restaurant when her dress caught fire from a candle placed on the floor. She suffered third-degree burns over 30% of her body, requiring extensive hospitalizations and multiple surgeries, including skin grafting and colecystectomy.
Melissa and her husband were visiting a boat showroom owned by MarineMax when she fell from an elevated platform erected without building permits or inspection. The platform did not have hand-rails and otherwise violated applicable building and safety codes. Melissa’s original shoulder injury required corrective surgery, after which she developed Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), also known as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
Aaron S. v. Finish Line Gas, Inc. et. al.: $1,025,000 Recovery
Fourteen-year-old Aaron was riding his skateboard on the Defendant’s premises when his wheels hit a broken section of pavement, causing him to fall into the street where he was struck in the head by a passing car. Aaron suffered catastrophic brain damage and is now confined to a wheelchair, requiring round the clock care. The settlement amount represents the policy limits for several defendants.
Medical Malpractice
Michelle T. v. Various Health-Care Providers: $2,013,000 Settlement Michelle T. was the victim of misdiagnosed lung cancer. After presenting to her family doctor and urologist for kidney stones in April, 2000, she was sent for a routine chest x-ray to clear her for a lithotripsy procedure. The radiologist saw a small questionable area of increased density in her left mid lung field and recommended further study via shallow oblique film, or chest CT scan. The report was received by her internist and urologist, but was not read for 16 months. At that time, Michelle’s condition had advanced, requiring that a portion of her lung be removed, and that she undergo chemotherapy and radiation for metastatic lung cancer.
Multiple defendants misdiagnosed David M. ’s adrenal cortical cancer which, ultimately, resulted in his death at age 32. David left behind a widow and three-year old son. The verdict was reduced by 50% comparative negligence. The Defendant Physician only held a $250,000 policy of insurance and his insurer, rather than defend a Bad Faith action, paid the Judgment.
Jessica and Danny H. were expecting the birth of their first child, a son to be named Danny, when they presented to PGH for a planned induction of labor. They arrived at approximately 12 midnight and were left unattended despite numerous pleas for assistance due to lack of fetal movement until 4:00am. By that time, Danny had died in utero from a massive feto-maternal hemorrhage. Shortly before settlement, the Court granted a rare Motion to Amend to Claim Punitive Damages against the Defendant.
Ms. G. delivered a baby girl, Brithney, with massive birth defects at home. After being transported to the NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit) of BMH, Brithney lived for three days before dying due to her birth defects. Brithney's body was taken to BMH's morgue, and placed on the cooler floor. Thereafter, a BMH employee mistook Brithney's remains for garbage, and incinerated it.
Legal Malpractice
Maritime/Admiralty/Cruise Injuries
Gregorio Z. v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.: Confidential Pre-Trial Settlement
Gregorio Z. was a Jones Act seaman aboard the vessel Norway, when he was diagnosed with a pre-maxillary tumor. Gregorio required extensive medical treatment that included removal of the tumor through facial re-sectioning and multiple brain surgeries. After receiving treatment and maintenance and cure for more than a decade, Norwegian settled for a confidential amount.
Herman W. v. Eller Ito Stevedoring: Full Award of Benefits
Herman W. was a longshoreman working at the Port of Miami when he was injured in a chemical spill. His employer denied both that the accident occurred and that Herman needed medical treatment. After a hearing before the U. S. Department of Labor, Herman was awarded benefits under the Longshore & Harborworkers Compensation Act.
Annette B. v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines: Confidential Pre-Trial Settlement
Annette B. was on a cruise with her husband when she slipped and fell on wet stairs on the vessel Enchantment of the Seas. Annette suffered multiple fractures to her left lower extremity. Royal Caribbean settled for ca confidential amount.
Adrian T. v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines: Confidential Pre-Trial Settlement
Adrian T. was a Jones Act seaman on board the vessel Mariner of the Seas, when he fell down a narrow flight of stairs in the kitchen. Adrian suffered multiple disc injuries to his back that required extensive orthopaedic treatment. The case settled for a confidential amount before trial.
Other Personal Injury
Bronson B. v. New Millennium Entertainment Corp.: $1,036,000 Verdict
Bronson B. was a guest at defendant’s nightclub when he was attacked by club employees, and suffered a traumatic brain injury.
Estate of Michael D. v. Universal Overseas Investment, Inc.: Confidential Pre-trial Settlement
Michael D. was the front seat passenger in a rental vehicle driven by a friend of his. The driver had been drinking, lost control of the vehicle and collided with a sign-post, killing himself and Michael D., and grievously injuring the back-seat passenger. The defendant owned an operated a gas station that supplied beer to the underage driver.
T. W. v. Feaman: $300,000 Settlement
T. W. was jogging in his residential neighborhood when Feaman’s dog jumped on him, knocking him to the ground. As a result, T.W. injured his shoulder, which ultimately required replacement surgery.
Civil Litigation
Bay State Supermarket v. JN Market, Inc.: $355,000 Judgment
Bay State Supermaket contracted for the sale of its business to JN Market. When JN Market failed to abide by the terms of the sales contract, Lawlor Winston pursued claims for breach of contract, violation of Florida's Worthless Check Act, and breach of guarantee. The firm obtained a judgment in excess of $355,000.00.
Dannell S. v. Advanced Orthopaedics of South Florida II, LLC, $251,315.91 judgment. Dr. A worked for Advanced Orthopaedics under a written contract. When Advanced Orthopaedics failed to properly pay her, Dr. A sued her former employer for back wages. Mr. Murphey litigated this case to a jury verdict, and the jury awarded Dr. A every penny she claimed her employer failed to pay. This case represents Lawlor Winston’s ability to successfully litigate labor and employment cases.
Appeals
Ginsberg v. Northwest Medical Center, 14 So. 3d 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
Lawlor Winston successfully appealed and overturned a summary judgment entered in favor of the hospital defendant, Northwest Regional Medical Center. In this case, the plaintiff, Harlan Ginsberg, sued two uninsured urologists, their uninsured medical group and the hospital for medical malpractice that occurred during a routine kidney stone removal procedure that resulted in the loss of his kidney. Mr. Ginsberg sued the hospital under a theory of apparent agency, as he relied on the hospital to provide the surgeons to him and they were held out as agents or employees of the hospital. Prior to surgery, hospital employees had Mr. Ginsberg sign a consent form while "he was in pain, did not have his glasses, and had taken pain medication, rendering him unable to understand the form." In a small typeset, the form stated that the hospital was not liable for the independent contractor physicians. The hospital filed summary judgment for itself, claiming that it was not liable for the independent contractors. The consent form was submitted as evidence. The trial court agreed and summary judgment was granted in its favor. The 4th District Court of Appeals reversed that ruling, found in favor of the Plaintiff, and remanded the case for further proceedings in the trial court. This opinion may have far-reaching consequences regarding the viability and use of informed consent forms.
Bender v. Caregivers of America, Inc., 42 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Lawlor Winston successfully appealed a Summary Final Judgment entered in favor of a home health agency based on an alleged exculpatory agreement. In this case, the firm’s client, Ethel Bender, contracted with Caregivers of America, Inc. for home health services. Caregivers had Ms. Bender sign multiple “Transportation Responsibility Releases” that it claimed absolved it of any liability for when its home health aide drove Ms. Bender around town. During one of those trips, Caregivers’ aide crashed her car and seriously injured Ms. Bender.
Bender v. F.H.C.S., Inc., 35 Fla. L. Weekly D2370 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Ben Murphey of Lawlor Winston prevailed in the appeal in Bender v. CareGivers of America, Inc. In this case, the trial court granted a similar Motion for Summary Final Judgment in favor of F.H.C.S. based on the same defective exculpatory agreement in CareGivers. Before the first brief was filed, Mr. Murphey convinced F.H.C.S. that the prior ruling in Caregivers made the appeal in the F.H.C.S. case frivolous. Mr. Murphey told F.H.C.S. that he would seek sanction against it if it pursued the appeal. In a rare move, F.H.C.S. filed a Confession of Error in the appellate court. Mr. Murphey’s work in this case resulted in an appellate reversal in three month’s time. Many appeals to the Fourth District Court of Appeal take more than eighteen months for a decision. As Ms. Bender was in her nineties, waiting that long for an appellate decision was not an option.
David v. Prime Hospitality Corp., 676 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Lawlor Winston attorney, John K. Lawlor, successfully appealed by Writ of Certiorari a order granting summary final judgment and transferring Mr. David’s case from circuit court to county court based on the Innkeeper’s Limitation of Liability Act. Mr. David claimed $50,000 of property was stolen from his car while he was staying the Defendant’s hotel. The Defendant claimed the Innkeeper’s Limitation of Liability Act prevented Mr. David’s claim. Mr. David testified that when he checked in, the hotel’s employee stated the parking lot was safe and Mr. Daivd need not worry about the property in his car. In reversing the trial court, the Third District Court of Appeal held the employee’s statement to Mr. David created a question as to whether the hotel misled Mr. David, and thus summary judgment based on the Innkeeper’s Limitation of Liability Act must be reversed. Because the summary judgment was reversed, so too was the transfer of the case from circuit court to county court.
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Personal Inury Law Firm Serving: Pompano Beach • Dania • Oakland Park • Lauderdale Lakes • Lauderhill • Cooper City • Weston • Coral Springs • Parkland • Deerfield • Miramar • Margate, • Hallandale • Ft. Lauderdale • Pembroke Pines • Plantation • Sunrise • Davie • Hollywood • Palm Beach County • Broward County • Dade County • Collier County • Lee County • Naples • Fort Meyers • Sarasota • Charlotte County • Martin County • Monroe County • Marco Island • Port Charlotte • St. Lucie County • Jensen Beach • Stuart • Port St. Lucie • Boca Raton • Miami • West Palm Beach • Aventura • Miami Beach • Kendall • Homestead • Florida Keys • Delray Beach • Cape Coral • Immokalee • Boca Grande • Bonita Springs • Naples Manor • Pelican Bay • Fort Myers Beach • Estero • Orangetree • Golden Gate • Lely • San Carlos Park • Iona • Cypress Lake • Gateway • St. James City • Vineyards • Punta Gorda • Charlotte Harbor • Port Charlotte • North Fort Myers • North Port • Cleveland • Englewood • Venice • Harbor Heights • Osprey • Sarasota • South Venice • Venice Gardens • Arcadia • Sarasta Springs • Fruitville
The hiring of an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you full written information about our qualifications and experience.

